Comments on: Circumcision, AIDS and Human Rights

By: Heroin and Cornflakes » Blog Archive » Circumcision: Should it be Illegal for Under 18’s?

Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:00:47 +0000

[...] my recent article, ‘Circumcision, AIDS and Human Rights‘ questioning the legitimacy of circumcision, I posted this question on an official White [...]

By: Hugh

Hugh — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:40:32 +0000

Anecdotees like McLaughlin’s get a lot of currency, but we never hear the
stories about the vast majority of intact boys and men who never have problems.
Newborns don’t get to tell what a “horrible experience” being circumcised is is
for them, even if they don’t remember it as adults. (We don’t actually know how
long they take to forget it – but one study found their bodies remember, in the
form of a stronger reaction to being vaccinated, months later.)

And there’s always doubt when a circumcision becomes “medically required” in a
small child. Was it because someone meddled with his foreskin, trying to
retract it before it was ready? It’s sometimes not ready before puberty, and
maybe not even then.

Very comprehensive article, but nothing about why a man might want to keep his
foreskin except human rights and protection of the glans. Restoring Tally
touches on it; an original-equipment foreskin has some 20,000 specialised nerve
endings. If they are not there for sexual pleasure, what was evolution/God
thinking of? And that’s not just “more sensitivity” it’s better sensitivity, or
as someone called it, “a symphony of sensation”.

By: Frank McGinness

Frank McGinness — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:48:16 +0000

It is my belief from past personal experience and other’s observation circumcised men use drugs to heighten their sexual sensations and desire. Crystal meth is thus the drug of choice becuase of its erogenous properties. Now being the fastest growing drug of choice in America, it makes sense it is used to compensate for the 75% missing sexual receptors. If men were naturally satisfied there would be no need to use illicit drugs, no huge market for erectile drugs, lube, and as Laumann et al. states the need for sexual contrivances. Rates of meth use are following the rates of regional circumcision. (becoming the biggest problem in the Midwest) Currently reported, are faster growing rates of meth use among females. (TEDS) I believe as men are using this drug for sex their female partners are getting hooked too. And as a study of Turk men (circumcised) and hashish use, their female partners push the use of hashish to better their men in duration and desire. I wouldn’t doubt US females may also do the same with meth.

By: Frank McGinness

Frank McGinness — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:47:49 +0000

Well written. But no mention of foreskin restoring men through non sugical mean by stretching there by growing a foreskin replacement though not a duplicate. The 75% average missing sexual receptors are forever lost. (Sorrells et al.) Still dekeratinization occurs to increase sensation and gliding action makes all sex better. With all the tools sold for foreskin restoration, I make mention the UK manufactured foreskin “SenSlip”, “Manhood”, and a “docking” sleeve product.

As with docking, it is not usually known in a circumcising society the common feat of the intact male to be able to orgasm hands free. This can be done by doing kegals where each squeeze enlarges the glans thus pulls back the foreskin each time activating the sexual receptors enough to orgasm.

Foremost foreskin researcher Dr. John Taylor’s Frenular Delta gives the skinny on function of the dartos muscle where any action on the shaft gets transferred to the frenulum nexus.
For circumcision effects on a global scale read online James Prescott’s Origins of Violence.

By: Catdozer

Catdozer — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:36:37 +0000

It should be illegal worldwide. Female circumcision is the cruelest thing inflicted on a young child !!!!!!!!!